Vivo X300 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro Max: $800 Phone Takes on Apple’s Flagship

In 2025, flagship smartphones are more than devices; they’re status symbols and power tools. The Vivo X300 Pro storms in with jaw-dropping specs at a fraction of the price, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max flaunts Apple’s legendary polish and ecosystem. This comparison isn’t just about numbers; it’s about what matters most to users: speed, camera quality, battery life, and overall value.

Key Specs:

Category	Vivo X300 Pro	iPhone 17 Pro Max	Winner
Build & Design	Slim, lighter, IP69, aluminum-glass	Rugged Ceramic Shield 2, IP68 (deeper water resistance)	iPhone (durability)
Display	AMOLED, brighter (4500 nits), more vivid	OLED, better calibrated, anti-reflective coating	Vivo (brightness), iPhone (accuracy)
Performance	Mediatek Dimensity 9500, raw power	Apple A19 Pro, ultra-efficient, stable	iPhone (optimization)
Battery Capacity	6510 mAh, 90W fast charging	Up to 5088 mAh, slower charging	Vivo
Charging Speed	90W wired, 40W wireless	PD 50% in 20 min, 25W wireless	Vivo
Main Camera	200MP telephoto, Zeiss optics, 8K support	48MP triple, LiDAR, Dolby Vision	Vivo (hardware), iPhone (consistency)
Selfie Camera	50MP, 4K recording	18MP, Dolby Vision, 3D sensors	Tie (Vivo for clarity, iPhone for features)
Software	Android 16 + OriginOS	iOS 26 with deep ecosystem	iPhone
Ecosystem	Standalone experience	Strong Apple ecosystem integration	iPhone
Unique Features	Satellite support (select markets), ultra-fast charging	UWB Gen 2, spatial video/audio, Apple Pay	Tie (depends on need)
Price	~$800	~$1200	Vivo (Best value for money)

1. Design and Display

Build and Feel:

Vivo X300 Pro feels sleek and comfortable with its lighter aluminum-glass build and IP69 rating. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max offers a more rugged feel with its Ceramic Shield 2 and stronger IP68 protection. Vivo is more ergonomic, while Apple focuses on durability and a premium grip.

Verdict: Vivo wins on comfort and sleekness; Apple wins on toughness and luxury.

Display Quality:

Vivo’s LTPO AMOLED display is bright and vivid, ideal for media lovers. Apple’s Super Retina XDR OLED is finely tuned for color accuracy and clarity. Vivo pushes visual impact, while Apple offers precision and polish.

Verdict: Vivo for brightness and punch; Apple for detail and balance.

2. Specifications

Performance:

The Dimensity 9500 chipset in Vivo delivers strong gaming and multitasking performance. Apple’s A19 Pro chip offers unmatched efficiency and smoothness through tight software-hardware integration. Vivo is fast, Apple is effortlessly stable.

Verdict: Vivo excels in power, Apple in long-term smoothness.

Battery and Charging:

Vivo’s 6510 mAh battery with 90W charging is built for heavy use and quick top-ups. Apple’s smaller battery relies on efficiency and MagSafe convenience but charges more slowly.

Verdict: Vivo leads in charging speed; Apple focuses on balance and efficiency.

3. Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses:

Vivo’s 200MP telephoto and Zeiss optics deliver sharp, versatile shots with pro-level controls. Apple’s 48MP system with LiDAR and Dolby Vision ensures consistently natural and stable images.

Verdict: Vivo wins on versatility; Apple wins on refined quality.

Selfie Camera:

Vivo’s 50MP selfie cam is sharp and wide, perfect for content creators. Apple’s 18MP with spatial audio and AR features gives more polished results.

Verdict: Choose Vivo for detail; Apple for immersive experience.

4. Pricing

Vivo’s $800 tag packs flagship features at a great value. Apple’s $1200 price reflects its ecosystem, software support, and premium build.

Verdict: Vivo offers better value overall; Apple delivers longevity and ecosystem perks for the extra $400.

5. Conclusion

Vivo impresses with its bright display, huge battery, and camera flexibility, great for users wanting maximum features at a lower price. Apple focuses on refinement, ecosystem integration, and reliability, ideal for long-term users.

Verdict: Choose Vivo for value and power; Apple for polish and ecosystem strength.

Read More:

Trending Products